Following the courts decision in US Stem Cell Clinic, CBER Director Peter Marks, M.D., stated in an FDA Voices blog post that the agency will continue cracking down on unapproved products marketed as regenerative medicine therapies, citing how the US Stem Cell decision is a victory for public health and an endorsement of the FDAs work to stop stem cell clinics that place patients at risk by marketing products that violate the law. Dr. Marks also referred to a second injunction case, United States v. Cell Surgical Network et al., which is currently being litigated in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and a third enforcement action pursued by the FDA involving the seizure of vials of Vaccinia Virus Vaccine, Live, which was resolved in March 2018.
Since 2015, FDA has been documenting violations of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) requirements for tissue products by US Stem Cell Clinic. The agency issued aWarning Letterto the clinic in August 2017, which weanalyzed here. The clinic claimed that FDAs cGMP regulations were not applicable because the treatment falls under FDAs same surgical procedure and 361 HCT/P exceptions to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and the Public Health Service Act (PHSA). In June 2019, a Florida district court ruled in favor of FDA, and enjoined the clinic from offering its stem cell therapy to patients.
As we summarized (here), the district courtfoundthat the population of stromal and vascular cells in US Stem Cell Clinics therapy, known as stromal-vascular fraction (SVF), requires FDA approval of a New Drug Application (NDA) or a Biologics License Application (BLA) before it can be commercially marketed. The court also found that the therapy was adulterated and misbranded because of the clinics manufacturing procedures and that its promotion violated statutory requirements.
On appeal with the Eleventh Circuit, US Stem Cell Clinic again argued it is exempt from regulation under the FDCA because the procedure falls into the same surgical procedure exception at 21 C.F.R. 1271.15(b). This provision states that FDAs regulation does not apply if you are an establishment that removes HCT/Ps from an individual and implants such HCT/Ps into the same individual during the same surgical procedure. Arguing before the District Court, FDA had successfullyassertedthat the SVF implanted into the clinics patients does not constitute such HCT/P removed from the patient due to the processing steps applied to the SVF in this case, meaning US Stem Cell Clinic was not covered by this exception.
In prefacing its analysis, the Eleventh Circuit notably explained that it was not merely offering judicial deference to FDA, saying it was giving the agencys view no special weight. The court said that although [t]here was a time when a court faced with a regulation that seemed impenetrable on first read might simply wave the ambiguity flag and defer to the agencys interpretation, this is the case [n]o longer. Rather, the court carefully consider[ed] the text, structure, history, and purpose of [the] regulation, and resolved the apparent ambiguity in FDAs favor.
First, the court considered the clinics argument that cells or tissues can be HCT/Ps only if they are intended for implantation into a patient, and it is the SVF and not the adipose tissue that is intended for implantation. The court rejected this defense, explaining that because adipose tissue contains the SVF, and because HCT/Ps are articles containing or consisting of human cells or tissues that are intended for implantation into a patient, both the adipose tissue and the SVF are HCT/Ps subject to regulation.
Second, US Stem Cell Clinic argued that an HCT/P re-implanted into a patient meets the regulatory definition of such HCT/P if it is like or similar to the HCT/P removed from the patient. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed. Instead, the court adopted FDAs interpretation that such HCT/P refers to the antecedent HCT/P removed from the patient in its original form. The Eleventh Circuit agreed with FDA and the District Court that the SVF procedure does not fall within the same surgical procedure exception because the biological material implanted into the patient is not the same as that removed. The court cited a history of FDA treating such HCT/Ps as meaning HCT/Ps in their original form that have not been subjected to significant processing.
The clinic also argued on appeal that it is exempt from regulation under the FDCA and PHSA because the procedure falls into the 361 HCT/P exception, whereby an HCT/P meeting four criteria (set forth in 21 C.F.R. 1271.10(a)) is deemed a 361 HCT/P, meaning that it is regulated solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) and its implementing regulations in 21 C.F.R. Part 1271. Being deemed a 361 HCT/P subjects a therapy to a lighter regulatory burden. However, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the 361 HCT/P exception does not apply because the HCT/P in this case is not intended for homologous use only.
Homologous use is the repair, reconstruction, replacement, or supplementation of a recipients cells or tissues with an HCT/P that performs the same basic function or functions in the recipient as in the donor. 21 C.F.R. 1271.3(c). US Stem Cell Clinic argued that SVF meets the homologous use criterion of a 361 HCT/P because SVF was intended to perform the same basic regenerative function both before and after the procedure. However, the District Court determined that the Clinic intended that the SVF treat a litany of illnesses in the recipient, which is not the same basic function that the SVF performed prior to the procedure.
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with the District Court that the clinic intends the stem cells to perform functions after the procedure that are beyond the basic functions the stem cells performed prior to the procedure. The court said that promotion of an HCT/P for an unproven therapeutic use, such as curing cancer, would be a nonhomologous use, and thus the 361 HCT/P exception does not apply in this case. In making this determination, the court said it relied upon the labeling, advertising, and other indications of the manufacturers objective intent. Because the defendants had marketed their SVF therapy to treat an array of diseases, the court found the clinic could not argue the pre-procedure SVF cells were intended to have performed the same function as the re-implanted SVF cells.
In issuing its opinion, the court permanently enjoined US Stem Cell Clinic from offering its adipose stem cell therapy unless and until several conditions were met, including FDA approval of a new drug application or biologics license application for the SVF solution.
In 2017, FDA published a new regenerative medicine policyframeworkconsisting of four guidance documents, which provided for a grace period of risk-based enforcement discretion for certain HCT/Ps, which ended on May 31, 2021. This grace period was meant to give certain manufacturers time to assess whether they need to file an IND or marketing application with FDA, or whether they met the four regulatory criteria for continuing to market their products solely under the authority of section 361 of the PHSA, which does not require pre-market review and approval.
Following up on the governments victory in this legal battle, CBER Director Peter Marks, M.D., published a blog on June 3 warning that FDA will be cracking down on unapproved products marketed as regenerative medicine therapies, citing how the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the lower courts judgment in US Stem Cell as cause for the renewed admonition. Marks wrote that the US Stem Cell decision is a victory for public health and an endorsement of the FDAs work to stop stem cell clinics that place patients at risk by marketing products that violate the law.
More recently, on July 9, CBER added a Q&A page on its website about the end of the HCT/P enforcement discretion period, drawing a clear line in the sand to convey that FDA is serious about the end of enforcement discretion period. Notably, the Q&A page directs physicians not to administer an HCT/P that does not qualify for 361 HCT/P status, until that HCT/P has a BLA, unless that physician is studying the HCT/P as a clinical investigator in a clinical trial under an IND. It also appears to say that there is no grace period for products that were introduced into interstate commerce before May 31, 2021 and are still on the market.
This was the not the first time that CBER has warned of impending enforcement of its regenerative medicine policy framework; in an FDA Voices blog post on April 21, Marks had written that the agency will not again extend the grace period for HCT/P companies to come into compliance with its regenerative medicine policy framework. In both that article and the June 3 publication, Marks emphasized that FDA has taken and will continue to take action regarding unlawfully marketed HCT/Ps. Most recently Marks wrote that, since December 2018, the FDA has issued 400 letters to manufacturers and health care providers who may be offering violative stem cell or related products. In addition, since 2017, FDA has issued 14 Warning Letters and 24 Untitled Letters involving violative HCT/Ps, Marks wrote.
We recently analyzed (online here) the significance that these warnings carry for companies in the regenerative medicine space, and outlined the potential risks of noncompliance. These risks go well beyond FDA enforcement, and include the possibility of FTC action, False Claims Act liability, product liability claims, and susceptibility to private lawsuits.
See original here:
- Issue: Cell Stem Cell - August 2nd, 2021
- Stem Cell Therapy & Alternative Medicine in Mexico ... - August 2nd, 2021
- Fetal Stem Cell - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics - August 2nd, 2021
- Stem cell therapy - SlideShare - August 2nd, 2021
- Essent Biologics Launches Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells For ... - August 2nd, 2021
- From Cells to Organs: The Present and Future of Regenerative Medicine - DocWire News - August 2nd, 2021
- USC Stem Cell scientists explore the latent regenerative potential of the inner ear - USC News - August 2nd, 2021
- Refining epilepsy treatment with brain organoids and AI - Monash University - August 2nd, 2021
- Astellas and Minovia link up on mitochondrial cell therapy programs - The Pharma Letter - August 2nd, 2021
- Stem Cell Scientists Explore the Latent Regenerative Potential of the Inner Ear - SciTechDaily - July 31st, 2021
- Colin Jackson health: Im in constant pain Athlete to undergo stem cell therapy to help - Express - July 31st, 2021
- The Talking Man: New Advances In Regenerative Medicine - Forbes - July 31st, 2021
- Medipost's clinical trial approved to evaluate efficacy of knee osteoarthritis treatment - Aju Business Daily - July 31st, 2021
- A Phase II Study of Polatuzumab Vedotin with Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Before Stem Cell Transplantation in People with... - July 31st, 2021
- Background should not be a barrier to access stem cell transplant treatment and care - PoliticsHome - July 31st, 2021
- Treatment Approaches for Patients With R/R DLBCL - Targeted Oncology - July 31st, 2021
- Global $57.4 Billion Cell And Gene Therapy Manufacturing Market to 2028 - Rising Pressure on Drug Developers/Manufacturers to Meet the Growing Market... - July 31st, 2021
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Fungal Infections: Types and Treatment - Healthline - July 31st, 2021
- Overview of DLBCL - Targeted Oncology - July 31st, 2021
- Roundtable Discussion: Participants Evaluate the Use of Transplant and MRD in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma - Targeted Oncology - July 31st, 2021
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Market: Allogeneic transplant is projected to continue to hold a dominant market share - BioSpace - July 27th, 2021
- Researchers develop a cell culture test to detect substances that harm the placenta and embryo - News-Medical.net - July 27th, 2021
- FDA Approves KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) for Treatment of Patients With High-Risk Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Combination With... - July 27th, 2021
- Cryopreservation of Unrelated Donor SCTs Safe, Effective in Patients Who Underwent HSCT - Hematology Advisor - July 27th, 2021
- Combination drug therapy can significantly benefit patients with newly diagnosed blood cancer - The Institute of Cancer Research, London - The... - July 25th, 2021
- Study proposes repurposed drug to treat COVID-19 - The Hindu - July 25th, 2021
- Injecting mice with pulmonary endothelial cells can reverse symptoms of emphysema - News-Medical.Net - July 25th, 2021
- FDA gives speedy review to Bayer's Parkinson's stem cell therapy - - pharmaphorum - July 23rd, 2021
- Stemming the tide of stem-cell treatment scams - Houston Chronicle - July 23rd, 2021
- Regenerative Medicine provides new hope and healing - Summit Daily News - July 23rd, 2021
- Emphysema Reversed in Mice Given Injection of Healthy Pulmonary Endothelial Cells - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - July 23rd, 2021
- Nelson: Gimpy girls have different means of recovery - Watertown Public Opinion - July 23rd, 2021
- Gene Therapy Protects Optic Nerve Cells and Vision in Mice with Retinal Injury and Glaucoma - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - July 23rd, 2021
- Has COVID-19 Opened up the Route to Market for Cell and Gene Therapy? - Pharmaceutical Executive - July 23rd, 2021
- Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy: New Insights, Emerging Treatments - OncLive - July 23rd, 2021
- Bluebird, with little fanfare, is first to bring a second gene therapy to market - BioPharma Dive - July 23rd, 2021
- Belumosudil Granted Full Approval for Treatment of Chronic GVHD by FDA - Cancer Network - July 21st, 2021
- Creative Medical Technology Holdings Announces MyeloCelz The Company's Second Regenerative Immunotherapy Product - PRNewswire - July 21st, 2021
- Stem Cell Therapy Gets Fast Track Status for Parkinson Disease - Monthly Prescribing Reference - July 21st, 2021
- Stem cell model reveals how COVID-19 can infect the brain - Study Finds - July 21st, 2021
- Donating a chance at life: Kokomo teacher donates stem cells to 75-year-old woman through Be the Match - Kokomo Perspective - July 21st, 2021
- Young Patients With Multiple Myeloma May Benefit From Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - Hematology Advisor - July 21st, 2021
- Emerging Quadruplets, Novel Targets, and Immunotherapy Advances Personalized Medicine in Multiple Myeloma - OncLive - July 21st, 2021
- BlueRock Therapeutics Receives FDA Fast Track Designation for DA01 in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson's Disease - Yahoo Finance - July 21st, 2021
- YOUR HEALTH: Finding cures by tracking cells - WQAD.com - July 21st, 2021
- Study shows promise of combining radiation therapy with dendritic-cell vaccines for breast cancer - News-Medical.Net - July 21st, 2021
- Profilin 1 Protein and Its Implications for Cancers - Cancer Network - July 17th, 2021
- Developmental Interest in Allogeneic PlacentaDerived Cell Therapies Expands - OncLive - July 17th, 2021
- For Patients with HIV and Cancer, a Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach is Critical - Targeted Oncology - July 17th, 2021
- The Memphis Institute of Regenerative Medicine Rebrands To Reflect Statewide Reach - UTHSC News - July 15th, 2021
- Dr. Sperling on Future Research With CAR T-Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma - OncLive - July 15th, 2021
- TiTAN-1 Trial of GEN-011 Initiates Treatment in Patients With Solid Tumors - Targeted Oncology - July 15th, 2021
- Saving a life, fixing the world - The Jewish Standard - July 15th, 2021
- Exosome spray may be better able to heal damaged hearts - New Atlas - July 15th, 2021
- Prime Medicine uncloaks with $315M to push 'search and replace' gene editing treatments - FierceBiotech - July 13th, 2021
- Dr. Sallman on Unmet Treatment Needs in Higher-Risk MDS - OncLive - July 13th, 2021
- U.S. Stem Cell, Inc The New Generation Company In The ... - July 11th, 2021
- Stem Cell Therapy - Stemedix | Regenerative Medicine Also ... - July 11th, 2021
- FIRM, CAS further cooperate to advance reproductive medicine research_china.org.cn - China.org.cn - July 11th, 2021
- England's drug price watchdog rejects Orchard's groundbreaking gene therapy after first round of talks - FiercePharma - July 11th, 2021
- ARO-HIF2 Shows Signals of Activity, Safety in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma - Targeted Oncology - July 9th, 2021
- Gene therapy for sickle cell disease: progress and competition - BioPharma Dive - July 9th, 2021
- Xilis Raises $70 Million Series A Financing to Advance Diagnostic and Drug Discovery and Development Platform Leveraging Proprietary MicroOrganoSphere... - July 9th, 2021
- Dr. Sperling on Future Research Directions With Ide-Cel in Multiple Myeloma - OncLive - July 9th, 2021
- More than $25m awarded to Monash researchers for vital medical research - Monash University - July 9th, 2021
- Magnetically-guided delivery of therapeutic stem cells into the brain - Advanced Science News - July 7th, 2021
- Beyond CAR-T: New Frontiers in Living Cell Therapies - UCSF News Services - July 7th, 2021
- Stem cell therapy could make significant impact as opioid alternative - The Pharma Letter - July 7th, 2021
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine ... - July 5th, 2021
- Home - World Stem Cell Summit - July 5th, 2021
- Stem Cell Therapy & Regenerative Medicine Clearwater, FL ... - July 5th, 2021
- Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research - July 5th, 2021
- Cell Therapy Global Market Report 2021: COVID-19 Growth and Change to 2030 - ResearchAndMarkets.com - Business Wire - July 3rd, 2021
- Regenerative Therapy Makes Headway in HF ... in the Right Patients - MedPage Today - July 3rd, 2021
- A New Era For FDA Regulation Of Cell And Tissue Products - Law360 - July 3rd, 2021
- Multiple myeloma treatment: Newest options, drugs, and more - Medical News Today - July 3rd, 2021
- Anti-CD22 CAR-T cell therapy as a salvage treatment - OTT | OTT - Dove Medical Press - July 3rd, 2021
- Studies Offer Promising Data on CAR T-cell Therapy in B-ALL, Multiple Myeloma - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network - July 3rd, 2021
- The cell therapy manufacturing market is projected to reach USD 14.5 billion by 2030, growing at - GlobeNewswire - July 3rd, 2021
- Cellular Model of a Developing Mouse Is Built With Spatial Resolution - Technology Networks - July 3rd, 2021